The perils of hiring a non-professional to shoot your wedding
Jan 20th, 2010
by vantagep.
Check
out this article from Seattle Bride magazine, discussing the perils of
hiring a non-professional to shoot your wedding. Definitely spot-on.
Original post can be found here.
I consider myself a pretty good amateur photographer. I’ve taken a
couple of classes, I have a nice Nikon D60 and, as a professional
travel writer, I’ve even had a few of my shots make magazine covers and
pages. If you didn’t budget for a professional photographer at your
wedding, I’m the friend you might call to take pictures.
So when Seattle Bride sent me to the late-winter wedding of Vicky Wu and Chris Nicoll to shoot alongside Joey Hong of John & Joseph Photography,
a local award-winning team of two brothers who have been shooting
commercial, fashion and wedding photography for more than eight years,
I was curious to see how well I could keep up with a seasoned pro.
From the moment we started shooting in the bride and groom’s room at
Hotel 1000, I was floored. “Vicky, look down at your shoulders…put a
gentle smile on your lips. Chris, look straight at my lens—no, smile.
Relax your forehead.” Joey’s attention to such minute detail went way
beyond “Say cheese” and brought out the couple’s absolute best. He knew
how to manipulate the room’s light and reflective surfaces in ways I
never would have dreamed of, transforming what I thought was an
unremarkable setting into a photo studio with endless possibilities.
Joey commanded family portraits with a gentle control and confidence
that only comes from years of experience. He had the right flashes and
steadiness of hand for getting great dance photos, while I snapped shot
after blurry shot in a mild panic that my precious memory space was
quickly dwindling. I was giving it my best, and in a few instances it
showed: an inside shot of Vicky simply glowing in the window’s natural
light; a close-up kiss in the sunlight where the couple wore the
sweetest smiles. But when those spontaneous moments that are here and
gone in the blink of an eye happened, Joey caught them with lightning
speed, while I lost many of them to improper focus or exposure.
I now disagree more than ever with the digital-age adage that “now
everyone is a photographer.” Tens of thousands of dollars in education,
equipment and experience separate me from the pros. Professional
photographers, like any other artists or business owners, need to spend
money to make money. When you hire them, you’re helping them pay for
their investments.
“Photography is a very equipment-intensive business, and the equipment is expensive,” says Scott Squire of NonFiction Weddings,
a Seattle-based photography team with 10 years of experience. To each
wedding, he and his partner bring six or seven top-drawer lenses, a
handful of strobes, three camera bodies, one backup and innumerable
accessories. (In contrast, if my equipment had failed, my backup would
have been my camera phone.)
Staying on top of new technology in the digital age is its own
challenge, one that takes a professional commitment and expense. “The
rate of change [in digital media] can be stupefying,” laughs longtime
Seattle-based wedding photographer Sharlane Chase. She keeps up with the flow of information at annual weeklong workshops and seminars, and it shows in her final product.
On a side note, like all of you reading this magazine, I also happen
to be planning my own wedding. My fiancé and I are on a tight budget
and had planned to take a gamble and hire an amateur photographer
friend. Now? We’re determined to find a way to get a pro.
Vicky and Chris would have been pretty disappointed if I had been
their only photographer. If anyone ever does ask me to take pictures at
their wedding, I’ll be happy to show up with my Nikon, and I may even
take the best disposable-camera shots of the whole night. I just hope
someone like Joey is there, too.
|